See where the transport day really goes.
routerecap lines up what your clock, your planner, your route system and your telematics each say about the same day. The driver explains the difference at the end of the shift.
Starts on the reports your systems already exportFigures and debrief switch on separately
A Libra Europe product
Stop note · Stop 3
Anything the planners should know?
Stop 3 · Arrival
Arrived outside the delivery window
What happened?
Enter your employee number
One transport day, created five times.
Every site runs the same five systems. Each gap between them has its own owner and its own fix.
Clock
Time and attendance
Plan
The planner
Journey plan
Route system
Journey actual
Proof of delivery
Actual
Telematics
The clock records every hour paid for.
The other four systems each record a shorter, or longer, version of the same day.
A control score for each site, and a list of who to talk to first.
Transport control scores how closely the day ran to plan. From 85 it reads In control, from 70 Slipping, and below that Out of control.
Under the score sit the hours lost between the clock and the journey plan, at replan, and on the road. Drivers and routes are ranked worst first, and every table exports to Excel as it sits on screen.
Is it fair to rank drivers?
What happens when data is missing or wrong?
Transport control
Illustrative dataControl score
0
Slipping
Paid, never put on a journey
Changed at replan
Drift on the road
Score by day
Drivers: worst to best control
Minimum 3 runs
| Driver | Runs | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Driver 0412 | 9 | 61 |
| Driver 0187 | 7 | 66 |
| Driver 0233 | 11 | 72 |
| Driver 0098 | 8 | 79 |
| Driver 0356 | 10 | 88 |
Two weeks of plan against actual on one chart.
The daily trend draws each source of hours as its own line, so the planned hours and what actually ran sit together, day by day. It can also show the control score for each day against its bands.
When you change something on the road, you can see whether the gap closes, and whether it stays closed.
Transport control
Illustrative dataThe planned route and the vehicle's trace, on one map.
Every stop keeps its arrival window and its time on site, so a late arrival can be read against the stop's own delivery window.
Route review
Illustrative dataRoute summary
- Actual distance
- 318 km
- Planned distance
- 301 km
- Mileage variance
- +6%
- Time on site, stop 3
- 48 min
- Planned route
- Vehicle trace
- Deviation
- Long dwell
The plan, as the route system drew it.
The planned route, stop by stop, dashed.
The driver's account sits beside the figures.
At the end of the shift the driver signs in at a touchscreen kiosk on site, sees their route on the map and explains each flagged incident with the site's own reason codes.
The transport manager reads those answers beside the route, with the driver's stop notes and the outcome, and can comment or raise an action. The outcome is supportive unless the site's rules call for a conversation with the transport manager.
How is the kiosk secured?
How do new drivers learn it?
Debrief review
Illustrative dataRoute 14 · Driver 0412
Supportive outcome3 incidents explained at the kiosk
- Arrival outside windowStop 3
Driver's reason: Waiting to unload › Queue at the gate
- Long dwellStop 3
Driver's reason: Waiting to unload › Paperwork at goods in
- Route deviationBetween stops 1 and 2
Driver's reason: Road closed or restricted
Stop note · Stop 3
The gate opens half an hour after the booked slot.
Team leader comment
Passed to planning to move the slot.
A site can start on the reports it already exports.
- 01
Routes, stops, worked hours and tachograph infringements, uploaded as files to begin with. Connected feeds follow once they have been checked.
- 02
Each worked-hours employee paired with their route driver. Names that match one driver and nobody else pair themselves.
- 03
A portrait touchscreen kiosk at each site, once you switch the debrief on. The figures work without it, so a site can start there.
- 04
Someone to set the site's rules, reason codes and outlier limits. A site can have its own, or inherit them from its client or contract.
The detail behind the claims on this page.
Which systems does it read?
What exactly does it compare?
How are drivers matched across systems?
Can two systems count the same route twice?
Do we need an integration project to start?
Does it replace our planning or telematics system?
Can we start without the driver debrief?
Can it be set up to fit each site?
Who can see what?
Is it only for HGV fleets?
See routerecap on demo data before you decide.
We will walk through the five sources, the scores and the debrief with your sites in mind.
Talk to Libra about routerecap
Tell us which systems your sites run and we will shape the walk-through around them.